复合材料科学与工程 ›› 2021, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (8): 5-10.DOI: 10.19936/j.cnki.2096-8000.20210828.001

• 基础研究 •    下一篇

工字形截面FRP杆件局部屈曲临界力计算方法分析

詹瑒1,2, 李奔奔1,3*, 崔璟4, 杨亚强5   

  1. 1.东南大学 混凝土及预应力混凝土结构教育部重点实验室,南京210096;
    2.南京工程学院 建筑工程学院,南京211167;
    3.南京工业大学 土木工程学院,南京211816;
    4.河南工业大学 土木工程学院,郑州450001;
    5.江苏科技大学 土木工程与建筑学院,镇江212003
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-09 出版日期:2021-08-28 发布日期:2021-09-09
  • 通讯作者: 李奔奔(1991-),博士,讲师,主要从事复合材料方面的研究,bben369@163.com。
  • 作者简介:詹瑒(1983-),博士,副教授,主要从事复合材料方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(51708259,51808265);东南大学混凝土及预应力混凝土结构教育部重点实验室开放课题基金(CPCSME2018-08,CPCSME2019-04)

Analysis of calculation method of critical loads for local buckling of I-section FRP members

ZHAN Yang1,2, LI Ben-ben1,3*, CUI Jing4, YANG Ya-qiang5   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures of the Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China;
    2. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211167, China;
    3. College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China;
    4. School of Civil Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China;
    5. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212003, China
  • Received:2020-10-09 Online:2021-08-28 Published:2021-09-09

摘要: 通过试验数据详细考察了目前用于预测工字形截面FRP杆件局部屈曲临界力的7种方法,即Kollar、Qiao、Cardoso、Pecce、美国土木工程师协会(ASCE)、Strongwell与Creative公司给出的7种计算方法的预测精度及性能。结果显示:ASCE与Cardoso建议预测方法的平均绝对误差均较大(分别为53%和49%),且预测值远低于试验值,过于保守;Strongwell公司建议预测方法的平均绝对误差高达60%,且预测值远高于试验值,过于不安全;Pecce与Creative公司建议方程均以ASCE建议方程为基础,通过相应的系数提高方程的预测精度,然而此种方法并不能体现FRP杆件局部屈曲失效的力学机理,且相应的系数并没有确切的物理意义,其预测平均绝对误差分别为17%和15%;Kollar和Qiao均采用离散板元法推导了预测方程,并充分考虑了腹板和翼缘之间的约束刚度对杆件局部稳定性能的影响,其预测平均绝对误差分别为17%和18%。考虑到预测方程的物理意义及预测精度,推荐采用Kollar建议方程预测FRP杆件局部屈曲临界力。

关键词: FRP杆件, 局部屈曲, 临界力, 预测精度, 复合材料

Abstract: The prediction accuracies of the seven generic closed-form solutions recommended by Kollar, Qiao, Cardoso, Pecce, ASCE, Strongwell and Creative corporations which can be used to predict the local buckling loads of I-section FRP members are evaluated according to test results published in the literature. The results show that the closed-form equations recommended by ASCE and Cardoso are too conservative with corresponding average absolute errors (AAE) of 53% and 49%, approximately. The equation recommended by Strongwell is the most unconservative of all equations with AAE of 60%. The equations recommended by Pecce and Creative are established based on ASCE equations, and the corresponding coefficients are used to improve prediction accuracy. However, the two equations cannot reflect the mechanical mechanism of local buckling failure of FRP members, and the corresponding coefficients have no specific mechanical implication. The AAE values of the two equations from Pecce and Creative are 17% and 15%, respectively. The two solutions provided by Kollar and Qiao are developed based on the discrete element method and the constraint stiffness between flange and web is taken into account. The AAE values of the two equations from Kollar and Qiao are 17% and 18%, respectively. Considering the mechanical implication and prediction accuracy, the closed-form solution developed by Kollar is recommended to be used to predict the local buckling loads of I-section FRP members.

Key words: FRP members, local buckling, critical load, prediction accuracy, composites

中图分类号: