蜂窝夹层结构冲击试验与仿真研究综述

doi:10.19936/j.cnki.2096-8000.20220328.018

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 蜂窝夹层结构因优异的耐撞性能和吸能能力,被广泛用于航空航天、汽车工业和船舶等领域。然而,蜂窝夹层结构在服役过程中很容易遭受到各种速度的冲击,这些冲击可能会导致蜂窝夹层结构性能的下降甚至损坏。因此对蜂窝夹层结构进行试验以及仿真分析,研究蜂窝夹层结构的抗冲击性能以及冲击过程十分重要。本文从蜂窝夹层结构冲击试验及仿真方面对国内外的研究成果进行了归纳和总结,在试验研究中总结了低速冲击和高速冲击的试验方案,包括摆锤冲击试验、落锤冲击试验以及空气炮试验。在仿真方面,从蜂窝夹层结构的建模、材料的损伤失效、冲击过程以及结构参数对冲击性能的影响等方面进行了汇总分析。最后对蜂窝夹层结构的冲击试验及仿真的研究趋势进行了展望。

关键词: 蜂窝夹层结构, 冲击试验, 数值仿真, 冲击性能, 冲击损伤, 复合材料

Abstract: Honeycomb sandwich structures have been widely used in aeronautics, automotive and marine industry because of their excellent crashworthiness performance, fatigue resistance and energy absorption ability. The honeycomb sandwich structure is susceptible to various speed impacts during service, and these impacts would cause the performance of the honeycomb sandwich structure to decrease or even be damaged. Therefore, it is very important to test and simulate the honeycomb sandwich structure to study the impact resistance and impact process of the honeycomb sandwich structure. This article summarizes the impact test and numerical simulations of honeycomb sandwich structures at home and abroad. In the experimental study, the low-velocity impact and high-velocity impact test scheme are summarized, including Charpy impact test, drop impact test and gas gun test. At the same time, in the simulation research, the modeling of honeycomb sandwich structure, the damage and failure of composite materials, the impact process and the influence of structural parameters on the impact performance are summarized. Finally, a preliminary prospect on the future development direction of the honeycomb sandwich structure impact experiment and simulation is given.

Key words: honeycomb sandwich structure, impact test, numerical simulation, impact performance, impact damage, composites

中图分类号:

TB332

李宗权, 张胜兰, 杨稳. 蜂窝夹层结构冲击试验与仿真研究综述[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2022, 0(3): 121-128.

LI Zong-quan, ZHANG Sheng-lan, YANG Wen. Research status of impact test and simulation of honeycomb sandwich structures[J]. COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 0(3): 121-128.

参考文献

[1] YANG X, SUN Y, YANG J, et al. Out-of-plane crashworthiness analysis of bio-inspired aluminum honeycomb patterned with horseshoe mesostructure[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2018, 125: 1-11.
[2] LIU S, ZHANG Y, LIU P. New analytical model for heat transfer efficiency of metallic honeycomb structures[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2008, 51(25-26): 6254-6258.
[3] HONG S T, PAN J, TYAN T, et al. Quasi-static crush behavior of aluminum honeycomb specimens under non-proportional compression-dominant combined loads[J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2006, 22(6): 1062-1088.
[4] DHARMASENA K P, WADLEY H N G, XUE Z, et al. Mechanical response of metallic honeycomb sandwich panel structures to high-intensity dynamic loading[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2008, 35(9): 1063-1074.
[5] QUEHEILLALT D T, WADLEY H N G. Titanium alloy lattice truss structures[J]. Materials & Design, 2009, 30(6): 1966-1975.
[6] KIM G, STERKENBURG R, TSUTSUI W. Investigating the effects of fluid intrusion on Nomex^® honeycomb sandwich structures with carbon fiber facesheets[J]. Composite Structures, 2018, 206: 535-549.
[7] RODRIGUEZ-RAMIREZ J, CASTANIE B, BOUVET C. Experimental and numerical analysis of the shear nonlinear behaviour of Nomex honeycomb core: Application to insert sizing[J]. Composite Structures, 2018, 193: 121-139.
[8] ANSARI M M, CHAKRABARTI A. Ballistic performance of unidirectional glass fiber laminated composite plate under normal and oblique impact[J]. Procedia engineering, 2017, 173: 161-168.
[9] XIN S H, WEN H M. A progressive damage model for fiber reinforced plastic composites subjected to impact loading[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2015, 75: 40-52.
[10] PAZ J, DÍAZ J, ROMERA L, et al. Size and shape optimization of aluminum tubes with GFRP honeycomb reinforcements for crashworthy aircraft structures[J]. Composite Structures, 2015, 133: 499-507.
[11] LURIE S, VOLKOV-BOGORODSKIY D, SOLYAEV Y, et al. Impact behavior of a stiffened shell structure with optimized GFRP corrugated sandwich panel skins[J]. Composite Structures, 2020, 248:
112479.
[12] 刘浩洋, 吕超雨, 石姗姗, 等. 芳纶纤维增韧碳纤维增强环氧树脂复合材料-铝蜂窝夹芯结构界面性能和增韧机制[J]. 复合材料学报, 2022, 39(2): 559-567.
[13] ZHANG Q, YANG X, LI P, et al. Bioinspired engineering of honeycomb structure-Using nature to inspire human innovation[J]. Progress in Materials Science, 2015, 74: 332-400.
[14] HU D, SONG B, WANG D, et al. Experiment and numerical simulation of a full-scale helicopter composite cockpit structure subject to a bird strike[J]. Composite Structures, 2016, 149: 385-397.
[15] KHAN L A, MEHMOOD A H. Cost-effective composites manufacturing processes for automotive applications[M]. Lightweight Composite Structures in Transport. Woodhead Publishing, 2016: 93-119.
[16] 赵勇. 复合材料船体低速冲击损伤研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2014.
[17] 李习习. 复合材料层合板低速冲击损伤与剩余压缩强度研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2014.
[18] UKAI S, IZAWA W, OONO N, et al. Charpy impact property related to {100} cleavage fracture in 15CrODS steel[J]. Materials Science and Technology, 2014, 30(13): 1709-1714.
[19] MEOLA C, BOCCARDI S, PETRONE G, et al. Infrared thermography to an aluminium foam sandwich structure subjected to low velocity impact tests[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2016, 167: 23-29.
[20] ZHANG D, FEI Q, ZHANG P. Drop-weight impact behavior of honeycomb sandwich panels under a spherical impactor[J]. Composite Structures, 2017, 168: 633-645.
[21] DONADON M V, IANNUCCI L, FALZON B G, et al. A progressive failure model for composite laminates subjected to low velocity impact damage[J]. Computers & Structures, 2008, 86(11-12): 1232-1252.
[22] WANG J, WAAS A M, WANG H. Experimental and numerical study on the low-velocity impact behavior of foam-core sandwich panels[J]. Composite Structures, 2013, 96: 298-311.
[23] 张俊琪, 刘龙权, 汪海. 薄面板复合材料蜂窝夹层结构冲击试验[J]. 复合材料学报, 2014, 31(4): 1063-1071.
[24] SHITTA-BEY O T, CARRUTHERS J J, SOUTIS C, et al. The localized low-velocity impact response of aluminium honeycombs and sandwich panels for occupant head protection: Experimental characterization and analytical modelling[J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2007, 12(5): 549-558.
[25] CRUPI V, EPASTO G, GUGLIELMINO E. Low-velocity impact strength of sandwich materials[J]. Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials, 2011, 13(4): 409-426.
[26] XIE Z H, YAN Q, TIAN J, et al. Quasi-static indentation test on composite sandwich panels with foam core[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2013, 718-720: 214-218.
[27] ASHAB A S M, RUAN D, LU G, et al. Experimental investigation of the mechanical behavior of aluminum honeycombs under quasi-static and dynamic indentation[J]. Materials & Design, 2015, 74: 138-149.
[28] UDE A U, ARIFFIN A K, AZHARI C H. Impact damage characteristics in reinforced woven natural silk/epoxy composite face-sheet and sandwich foam, coremat and honeycomb materials[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2013, 58: 31-38.
[29] XUE X, ZHANG C, CHEN W, et al. Study on the impact resistance of honeycomb sandwich structures under low-velocity/heavy mass[J]. Composite Structures, 2019, 226: 111223.
[30] 辛亚军, 张立伟, 刘小蛮, 等. 蜂窝铝夹芯板动态冲击试验研究[J]. 机械强度, 2018, 40(4): 802-809.
[31] ARSLAN K, GUNES R. Experimental damage evaluation of honeycomb sandwich structures with Al/B4C FGM face plates under high velocity impact loads[J]. Composite Structures, 2018, 202: 304-312.
[32] YAHAYA M A, RUAN D, LU G, et al. Response of aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels subjected to foam projectile impact-An experimental study[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2015, 75: 100-109.
[33] HOU W, ZHU F, LU G, et al. Ballistic impact experiments of metallic sandwich panels with aluminium foam core[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2010, 37(10): 1045-1055.
[34] REN P, TAO Q, YIN L, et al. High-velocity impact response of metallic sandwich structures with PVC foam core[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2020, 144: 103657.
[35] VILLANUEVA G R, CANTWELL W J. The high velocity impact response of composite and FML-reinforced sandwich structures[J]. Composites Science and Technology, 2004, 64(1): 35-54.
[36] ZEN S, AVA K, GEDIKLI H, et al. Low-energy impact response of composite sandwich panels with thermoplastic honeycomb and reentrant cores[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2020, 156: 106989.
[37] 谢鑫, 段玥晨, 齐佳旗. 冲击角度对铝蜂窝夹芯板低速冲击性能的影响[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2020(4): 19-27.
[38] 张立伟. 蜂窝铝夹芯板低速冲击实验与数值模拟研究[D]. 秦皇岛: 燕山大学, 2018.
[39] 王晓强, 胡方靓, 徐双喜. 蜂窝夹芯板的抗高速冲击性能研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版), 2021, 45(4): 709-714.
[40] LIU J, CHEN W, HAO H, et al. Numerical study of low-speed impact response of sandwich panel with tube filled honeycomb core[J]. Composite Structures, 2019, 220: 736-748.
[41] GUNES R, ARSLAN K. Development of numerical realistic model for predicting low-velocity impact response of aluminium honeycomb sandwich structures[J]. Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials, 2016, 18(1): 95-112.
[42] 齐佳旗, 段玥晨, 李成, 等. 低速冲击下铝蜂窝夹层板的动态响应研究[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2019(5): 5-11.
[43] ZHANG D, JIANG D, FEI Q, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation on indentation and energy absorption of a honeycomb sandwich panel under low-velocity impact[J]. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2016, 117: 21-30.
[44] WOWK D, REYNO T, YEUNG R, et al. An experimental and numerical investigation of core damage size in honeycomb sandwich panels subject to low-velocity impact[J]. Composite Structures, 2020, 254: 112739.
[45] FAN J, GUAN Z, CANTWELL W J. Modeling perforation in glass fiber reinforced composites subjected to low velocity impact loading[J]. Polymer composites, 2011, 32(9): 1380-1388.
[46] SHARUNOV MYKOLA. 复合材料蜂窝夹芯板低速冲击损伤分析[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2019.
[47] 齐佳旗, 段玥晨, 铁瑛, 等. 结构参数对CFRP蒙皮-铝蜂窝夹层板低速冲击性能的影响[J]. 复合材料学报, 2020, 37(6): 1352-1363.
[48] ZHANG X, XU F, ZANG Y, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation on damage behavior of honeycomb sandwich panel subjected to low-velocity impact[J]. Composite Structures, 2020, 236: 111882.
[49] CHATURVEDI R, TRIKHA M, SIMHA K R Y. Impact penetration through spacecraft honeycomb panels analytical, numerical and experimental study[J]. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2020, 21: 1050-1058.
[50] ŽMINDÁK M, PELAGIĆ Z, PASTOREK P, et al. Finite element modelling of high velocity impact on plate structures[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2016, 136: 162-168.
[51] KOLOPP A, ALVARADO R A, RIVALLANT S, et al. Modeling impact on aluminium sandwich including velocity effects in honeycomb core[J]. Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials, 2013, 15(6): 733-757.
[52] BUITRAGO B L, SANTIUSTE C, SáNCHEZ-SÁEZ S, et al. Modelling of composite sandwich structures with honeycomb core subjected to high-velocity impact[J]. Composite Structures, 2010, 92(9): 2090-2096.
[53] HOU J P, PETRINIC N, RUIZ C, et al. Prediction of impact damage in composite plates[J]. Composites Science and Technology, 2000, 60(2): 273-281.
[54] FELI S, POUR M H N. An analytical model for composite sandwich panels with honeycomb core subjected to high-velocity impact[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2012, 43(5): 2439-2447.
[55] TANG E, YIN H, CHEN C, et al. Simulation of CFRP/aluminum foam sandwich structure under high velocity impact[J]. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2020, 9(4): 7273-7287.
[56] CORBETT G G, REID S R, JOHNSON W. Impact loading of plates and shells by free-flying projectiles: A review[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1996, 18(2): 141-230.
[57] SUN G, CHEN D, WANG H, et al. High-velocity impact behaviour of aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels with different structural configurations[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2018, 122: 119-136.
[58] GHALAMI-CHOOBAR M, SADIGHI M. Investigation of high velocity impact of cylindrical projectile on sandwich panels with fiber-metal laminates skins and polyurethane core[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2014, 32(1): 142-152.
[59] RAHIMIJONOUSH A, BAYAT M. Experimental and numerical studies on the ballistic impact response of titanium sandwich panels with different facesheets thickness ratios[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2020, 157: 107079.
[60] ABBASI M, NIA A A. High-velocity impact behavior of sandwich structures with AL faces and foam cores-Experimental and numerical study[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 105: 106039.
[61] HERRMANN W. Constitutive equation for the dynamic compaction of ductile porous materials[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1969, 40(6): 2490-2499.
[62] DAR U A, ZHANG W, XU Y. Modeling the perforation failure of honeycomb sandwich structures through numerical homogenization[C]//Proceedings of 2013 10th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences & Technology (IBCAST). IEEE, 2013.
[63] KAMRAN M, WU F, XUE P, et al. New numerical modeling for impact dynamics behavior of composite honeycomb sandwich structures[J]. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2020, 33(4): 04020016.