FRP筋再生混凝土梁受弯性能试验研究

doi:10.19936/j.cnki.2096-8000.20231028.008

复合材料科学与工程 ›› 2023, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (10): 52-59.DOI: 10.19936/j.cnki.2096-8000.20231028.008

FRP筋再生混凝土梁受弯性能试验研究

靳高明¹, 孙康才¹, 刘生纬^2*, 白晟渝²

1.甘肃建投建设有限公司,兰州730070;
2.兰州交通大学道路桥梁重点实验室,兰州730070

收稿日期:2022-09-05 出版日期:2023-10-28 发布日期:2023-12-13
通讯作者: 刘生纬(1987—),男,博士,副教授,主要从事再生混凝土结构方面的研究,1034849076@qq.com。
作者简介:靳高明(1979—),男,研究生,高级工程师,主要从事FRP筋与再生混凝土结构方面的研究。
基金资助:
甘肃省科技计划资助(20YF8GA009);住房和城乡建设部2021年科学技术计划(2021-K-011)

Experimental study on flexural behavior of FRP bars recycled concrete beams

JIN Gaoming¹, SUN Kangcai¹, LIU Shengwei^2*, BAI Chengyu²

1. Gansu Construction Investment Construction Co. Ltd., Lanzhou 730070, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Road and Bridge, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China

Received:2022-09-05 Online:2023-10-28 Published:2023-12-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了研究FRP筋再生混凝土(RAC)梁受弯性能,试验制作八根FRP筋再生混凝土梁(其中GFRP筋和BFRP筋再生混凝土梁的数量分别为六根和两根),通过四点弯曲试验研究再生骨料(RA)替代率与FRP筋类型对梁破坏模式、挠度和承载力等性能的影响。试验结果表明:①梁的开裂荷载和极限承载力均随着再生骨料替代率的增加而下降,且破坏模式也逐渐由正截面混凝土受压破坏转为斜拉破坏;②BFRP筋弹性模量的提高使梁的混凝土受压区高度增加,正截面承载力增加,而斜截面承载力提高较少,从而使BFRP筋再生混凝土梁发生斜拉破坏;③规范计算得到的FRP筋再生混凝土梁承载力安全储备略显不足,建议实际配筋率为平衡配筋率ρ_fb的1~1.5倍时,设计值取规范计算值的0.8倍;④GB与ACI挠度计算值均与试验值拟合程度较好,能很好地预测FRP筋再生混凝土梁的挠度值。

关键词: FRP筋再生混凝土梁, 破坏模式, 开裂荷载, 荷载-挠度曲线, 极限承载力, 复合材料

Abstract: In order to study the flexural performance of FRP bars RAC (recycled aggregate concrete) beams, 8 FRP bars RAC beams were experimentally fabricated, of which the number of GFRP bars and BFRP bars RAC beams was 6 and 2, respectively. The effects of RA (recycled aggregate) replacement rate and FRP bars type on the failure mode, deflection and bearing capacity of beams were studied by four-point bending test. The test results show that: ①The cracking load and ultimate bearing capacity of the beam both decreased with the increase of RA replacement rate, and the failure mode gradually changes from the compression failure of normal section concrete to the diagonal tensile failure; ②The increase in the elastic modulus of BFRP bars increases the height of the RAC compression zone of the beam, which improves the bearing capacity of the normal section of the beam, but the bearing capacity of the oblique section increases less, so that the diagonal tensile failure of the RAC beam with BFRP bars occurs; ③The safety reserve of the bearing capacity of FRP reinforced RAC beams calculated by the specification is slightly insufficient. It is suggested that when the actual reinforcement ratio is 1~1.5 times of the equilibrium reinforcement ratio ρ_fb, the design value is 0.8 times of the calculated value of the specification; ④The calculated deflection values of GB and ACI are in good agreement with the experimental values, which can well predict the deflection value of FRP reinforced RAC beams.

Key words: FRP bars recycled aggregate concrete beams, failure mode, cracking load, load-deflection curve, ultimate bearing capacity, composites

中图分类号:

TB332

靳高明, 孙康才, 刘生纬, 白晟渝. FRP筋再生混凝土梁受弯性能试验研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2023, 0(10): 52-59.

JIN Gaoming, SUN Kangcai, LIU Shengwei, BAI Chengyu. Experimental study on flexural behavior of FRP bars recycled concrete beams[J]. COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 0(10): 52-59.

参考文献

[1] 吕旭滨, 于江, 秦拥军, 等. 再生混凝土梁受弯破坏过程声发射的灰色模型[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2019, 19(28): 270-275.
[2] 张海霞, 朱天泽, 黄妍. 盐腐蚀环境下内嵌FRP筋加固混凝土界面黏结性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2021, 42(S1): 433-441.
[3] 宋文涛, 曹宝珠, 董金爽, 等. 碳纤维增强复合材料编织网混凝土梁的试验研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2019, 19(26): 304-309.
[4] 魏康, 李犇, 孙峤. 玄武岩纤维改善再生混凝土抗氯离子渗透性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(5): 1656-1662.
[5] 徐福卫, 田斌, 徐港. 界面过渡区厚度对再生混凝土损伤性能的影响分析[J]. 材料导报, 2022, 36(4): 122-128.
[6] MUHAMMED U, KURSAT E A. A holistic assessment of the use of emerging recycled concrete aggregates after a destructive earthquake: Mechanical, economic and environmental [J]. Waste Management, 2022, 146: 53-65.
[7] JEONGHYUN K. Influence of quality of recycled aggregates on the mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concretes: An overview[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 328: 127071.
[8] ZHANG H H, XIAO J Z, TANG Y X, et al. Long-term shrinkage and mechanical properties of fully recycled aggregate concrete: Testing and modelling[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2022, 130: 104527.
[9] ZHU L H, WEN T H, TIAN L. Size effects in compressive and splitting tensile strengths of polypropylene fiber recycled aggregate concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 341: 127878.
[10] MOHAMMAD A, GEORGE M, NIKOS B, et al. AI-based shear capacity of FRP-reinforced concrete deep beams without stirrups[J]. Engineering Structures, 2022, 264: 114441.
[11] 曹万林, 刘亦斌, 肖建庄, 等. 配筋再生混凝土棱柱体徐变试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2020, 41(12): 141-147, 164.
[12] 韩定杰, 刘中宪, 刘华新, 等. 玄武岩纤维筋增强再生混凝土梁抗剪性能的试验研究[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2018(2): 15-20.
[13] 韩飞, 孔祥清, 鲍成成, 等. BFRP筋再生混凝土梁抗弯性能试验研究[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2017(12): 45-50.
[14] 张剑瑞, 曹家乐, 王彦鹏, 等. 超高性能混凝土加固钢筋混凝土梁抗剪性能[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2022, 22(19): 8421-8430.
[15] 张志强, 师晓权, 李志业. GFRP筋混凝土梁正截面受弯性能试验研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2011, 46(5): 745-751.
[16] SHEN X Y, LI B, SHI W Z, et al. Numerical study on flexural behaviour of FRP reinforced concrete beams with compression yielding blocks[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2022, 17: e01169.
[17] SHEHAB M, HAMDY M M, ADEL E S, et al. Bond-dependent coefficient and cracking behavior of lightweight self-consolidating concrete (LWSCC) beams reinforced with glass- and basalt-FRP bars[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 329: 127130.
[18] 杜修力, 王作虎, 詹界东. 预应力CFRP筋混凝土梁受剪性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2011, 32(4): 80-86.
[19] 张晓亮, 屈文俊. 无腹筋混合配筋混凝土梁抗剪性能试验研究[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 38(10): 1421-1427.
[20] 徐新生, 纪涛, 郑永峰. FRP筋混凝土梁挠度的特点及计算方法[J]. 工程力学, 2009, 26(S1): 171-175.
[21] 邓宇, 张鹏, 李冰. FRP筋混凝土梁正截面承载力计算方法的研究[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2009(3): 6-7, 75.
[22] ALIREZA A, MASOUMED T, JAVAD S, et al. Prediction of the effective moment of inertia for concrete beams reinforced with FRP bars using an evolutionary algorithm[J]. Structures, 2022, 35: 684-705.
[23] HAN S W, ZHOU A, OU J P. Relationships between interfacial behavior and flexural performance of hybrid steel-FRP composite bars reinforced seawater sea-sand concrete beams[J]. Composite Structures, 2021, 277: 114672.
[24] Canadian Standards Association (CSA). Design and construction of building structures with fiber-reinforced polymers: CSA S806-12[S]. Mississauga: Canadian Standards Association, 2012.
[25] American Concrete Institute (ACI) Committee 440. Guide for the design and construction of concrete reinforced with FRP bars: ACI 440.1R-15[S]. Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute, 2015.
[26] 纤维增强复合材料建设工程应用技术规范: GB 50608—2010[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2011.
[27] 冯鹏, 叶列平, 黄羽立, 等. 受弯构件的变形性与新的性能指标的研究[J]. 工程力学, 2005, 22(6): 28-36.

FRP筋再生混凝土梁受弯性能试验研究

Experimental study on flexural behavior of FRP bars recycled concrete beams

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王孟, 刘程, 张玉, 贾航, 乔越, 蹇锡高. 成型温度对CF/PPEK复合材料的缺陷和力学性能影响[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(3): 5-12.
[2]	史洪源, 任文坚, 党杰, 周鹏. 玻璃纤维增强复合材料超声检测声场的CIVA仿真与试验研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(3): 20-24.
[3]	杨思鑫, 曹忠亮, 顾付伟. 双三角点阵夹芯结构低速冲击下的动态响应与失效机制[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(3): 25-34.
[4]	张斌, 赵晶, 王世杰. Kagome点阵结构参数对其压缩特性的影响及轻质化设计[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(3): 35-42.
[5]	王宇轩, 曹东风, 胡海晓, 李书欣. 计及层内和层间的L形层合板失效的数值研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(3): 43-53.
[6]	耿健, 董九志, 梅宝龙, 蒋秀明. 三维四向碳/碳复合材料力学性能预测与试验验证[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(3): 54-60.
[7]	高坤, 张兆恒, 邢亚娟, 左小彪, 王博尧, 赵泽华. 含磷POSS阻燃乙烯基酯树脂性能研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(3): 61-64.
[8]	郑子君, 乔英, 邵家儒. 基于机器视觉的短纤维复合材料的取向度提取方法[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(3): 65-72.
[9]	许晓婷, 郝恩全, 邵慧奇, 邵光伟, 毕思伊, 陈南梁, 蒋金华. 三维大隔距机织间隔织物柔性复合材料的服役性能研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(3): 73-78.
[10]	苏桐, 胡果馨, 刘振. 全碳纤维复合材料太阳能无人机机翼结构优化设计[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(3): 79-83.
[11]	伍强, 赵凯, 刘鹏飞, 张涛涛, 朱德勇. Z形纤维增强复合材料层压板固化变形分析[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(3): 84-90.
[12]	宋贵宾, 黄光启, 杨胜春. 复合材料层压板胶接挖补修理分析方法及影响因素研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(3): 91-96.
[13]	王耀, 邵丹丹, 雷炳育. 共沉淀析出-热压技术制备高储能性能复合材料薄膜[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(3): 97-102.
[14]	张仲香, 刘宝锋, 方晨鑫, 陈文光, 顾育慧, 李军向. 沙戈荒环境下风电叶片中复合材料耐高温性能研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(3): 103-107.
[15]	邓忠, 支亚非, 程家林, 杨文. 太阳能无人机机翼复合材料主梁铺层优化[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2024, 0(3): 108-112.