配筋解决混凝土碳化对桥梁面板的负面影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

桥梁面板是桥梁结构的主要构件，对结构的整体性能和交通运输起着至关重要的作用。然而随着使用年限的增加，混凝土碳化将对钢筋混凝土桥梁面板的耐久性能产生较大的影响。近年来，玻璃纤维增强复合筋材(GFRP Bars)因具有高强、轻质、耐腐蚀等性能而逐渐被工程界认可。非线性有限元分析结果表明，由于压缩薄膜效应的存在使得同样配筋率的GFRP筋混凝土桥梁面板与钢筋混凝土桥梁面板的工作性能相似，证实了GFRP筋代替钢筋的可行性。在分析混凝土的碳化机理和GFRP的材料属性后发现，由于碳化使混凝土的渗透性和孔隙率降低，在碳化发生以后GFRP筋混凝土桥梁面的耐久性能不仅没有下降反而有所提高。

关键词: GFRP筋, 混凝土桥梁面板, 碳化

Abstract:

As crucial structural components in bridge structures, bridge deck slabs played an important role in integral structural behaviours and transportation. However, with the increasing of ages in services, the durability of reinforced concrete bridge deck slabs was influenced significantly by carbonation. Recently, because of high strength, light weight and strong corrosionresistance, glass fiber polymer reinforcement bars (GFRP bars) were accepted by civil engineers. Due to the existence of compressive membrane action, it was shown that the structural behaviours of GFRP reinforced concrete bridge deck slabs with same reinforcement percentage were similar as those of steel reinforced concrete bridge deck slabs in nonlinear finite element analysis. Based on numerical analysis results, GFRP is available to be used as replacement of steel reinforcement. According the analysis of mechanism of concrete carbonation and material properties of GFRP, it was found that the durability of GFRP reinforced concrete bridge deck slabs was enhanced after the occurrence of carbonation in concrete structures, because carbonation reduced the permeability and porosity of concrete.

中图分类号:

TU377.9

郑愚, 秦怀泉, 李春红. 配筋解决混凝土碳化对桥梁面板的负面影响[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2009, 209(4): 53-58.

ZHENG Yu, QIN Fu-Quan, LI Chun-Gong. THE SOLUTION FOR ADVERSE IMPACT OF CARBONATION ON CONCRETE
BRIDGE DECK SLABS BT USING GFRP REINFORCEMENT[J]. Fiber Reinforced Plastics/Composites, 2009, 209(4): 53-58.

参考文献

［1］范立础，桥梁工程［M］.北京：人民交通出版社，2004.
［2］ G.H. Koch, M.P.H. Brongers, N.G. Thompson, Y.P. Virmani, and J.H. Payer, “Corrosion Cost and Preventive Strategies in the United States”, Report No. FHWARD01156 ［report online］ (Dunblin, Ohio: CC Technologies, 30 September 2001, accessed 16 June 2004), 2224; available form.
［3］李田,刘西拉. 混凝土结构耐久性分析与设计［M］. 北京：科学出版社,1999.
［4］洪乃丰. 混凝土中钢筋腐蚀与结构物的耐久性［C］.第五届全国混凝土耐久性学术交流会论文集. 大连,2000.
［5］闫宏生，混凝土的碳化及其对钢筋腐蚀的影响［J］.内蒙古科技与经济，2004，（18）：7375.
［6］赵铁军，李淑进，碳化对混凝土渗透性及孔隙率的影响［J］.工业建筑，2003,33(1):4647.
［7］ Yu Zheng, Des Robinson, Su Taylor, David Cleland. Analysis of Compressive Membrane Action in Concrete Slabs ［J］. ICE ProceedingBridge Engineering,2008.
［8］ Yu Zheng, Des Robinson, Su Taylor, David Cleland. Investigation of ultimate strength of deck slabs in composite steelconcrete bridges［C］. Bridge Engineering Research in Ireland, 2006.
［9］ Yu Zheng, Des Robinson, Su Taylor, David Cleland. Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Compressive Membrane Action in Deck Slabs of Composite SteelConcrete Bridge［C］. Conference of Concrete Platform, Belfast, 2007.
［10］ Yu Zheng, Su Taylor, Des Robinson, David Cleland. Investigation of the Compressive Membrane Action in Composite SteelConcrete Bridge Decks［C］. Third International Conference on Steel and Composite Structures (ICSCS Manchester 07).
［11］ Yu Zheng, Des Robinson, Su Taylor, David Cleland. Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Compressive Membrane Action in Concrete Slabs［C］.Concrete Research in Ireland Colloquium，2005.
［12］ Onofrei, M.Durability of GFRP reinforced concrete from field demonstration structures［R］. ISIS Canada Research Network,2005.
［13］ ACI Committee 440, Guide for Design and Construction of Concrete Structures Reinforced with FRP Bars［S］. Detroit, Michigan: American Concrete Institute, 2001.
［14］ ISIS Canada, Reinforcing concrete structures with fiber reinforced polymers, ISIS M0301, Canadian Network of Centers of Excellence on Intelligent Sensing for Innovative Structures［S］. University of Winnipeg, Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada, 2001.
［15］ Canadian Standards Association (CSA), Design and construction of building components with fiber reinforced polymers［S］. CSA S80602, Toronto, 2002.
［16］ American Concrete Institute, Guide for the design and construction of concrete reinforced with FRP bars［S］. ACI 440.1R03, Farmington Hills, Mich, 2003.
［17］ ElSalakawy, E. F., and Benmokrane, B., ElRagaby, A. Nadeau D. Field Investigation on the First Bridge Deck Slab Reinforced with Glass FRP Bars Constructed in Canada［J］. Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, 2005,9(6): November 470479.
［18］ A.C. Berg, L.C. Bank, M.G. Oliva, and J.S. Russell. Construction8 and Cost Analysis of an FRP Reinforced Concrete Bridge Deck［J］. Construction and Building Materials,2006,(20):515526.
［19］ Zheng, Y.. Modelling of Compressive Membrane Action in Concrete Bridge Decks ［D］. PhD. Thesis, Queens University of Belfast, 2007.
［20］ Taylor, S.E., Rankin G.I.B. and Cleland D.J.. Arching action in high strength concrete slabs［J］, ICE ProceedingsStructures and Buildings, 2001,146(4):353262.
［21］ Atena. http://www.cervenka.cz.

[1]	薛亚俊, 张明, 顾红星, 张淑斌, 齐晶瑶. PAN原丝直径对碳纤维收率的影响[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2021, 0(3): 94-98.
[2]	涂建维, 付金海, 高奎, 谢华. 方形螺旋箍筋GFRP筋混凝土柱轴压性能研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2020, 0(8): 5-11.
[3]	胡成超, 高奎, 涂建维, 付金海. GFRP筋与箍筋约束混凝土之间粘结性能的试验研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2020, 0(10): 13-20.
[4]	冯振宇, 樊茂华, 范保鑫, 王纳斯丹. 阻燃改性玻璃纤维环氧树脂的热响应预报方法[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2019, 0(9): 32-37.
[5]	冯振宇, 王纳斯丹, 樊茂华, 范保鑫. 玻璃纤维乙烯基酯树脂复合材料的热响应预报方法[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2019, 0(11): 24-29.
[6]	王国强, 孙理想. GFRP筋混凝土板正截面抗弯承载力研究[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2017, 0(7): 29-34.
[7]	李星,孙理想,蔺鹏臻,杨子江. 长期腐蚀环境影响下GFRP筋混凝土构件的老化机理及抗弯性能研究[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2017, 0(6): 12-17.
[8]	张卫东, 王振波, 王成武. GFRP筋与再生混凝土粘结性能试验研究[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2016, 0(9): 66-69.
[9]	张卫东, 王振波, 何卫忠. GFRP筋与橡胶混凝土粘结性能试验研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2015, 0(8): 71-74.
[10]	代力, 何雄君, 杨文瑞, 何有为. 混凝土碱环境中GFRP筋耐久性能试验研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2015, 0(8): 75-79.
[11]	武军, 陈文学, 焦裕钊. 不同直径GFRP筋的拉伸性能尺寸效应试验研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2015, 0(4): 35-40.
[12]	刘小艳, 王毅, 王新瑞, 许武军. GFRP筋在海洋环境下的耐久性研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2015, 0(3): 78-82.
[13]	孙璨, 丘文浩, 曾宪彬, 郑愚. 不同环境条件下GFRP筋长期力学性能实验对比研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2014, 0(8): 88-91.
[14]	李义全, 逄增凯, 陈万康, 张作朝. 风电叶片模具用碳化硅热容层导热性能研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2014, 0(7): 50-52.
[15]	杨健彬, 郑愚, 魏木旺. 采用GFRP筋作为约束构件的体内不配筋混凝土板带的工作性能研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2014, 0(12): 41-46.