玻璃钢/复合材料 ›› 2017, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1): 30-35.

• 基础研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

椭圆边非弯折织物渗透率预测公式的研究

康宁, 梁玄勇   

  1. 北京航空航天大学交通科学与工程学院,北京100083
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-16 出版日期:2017-01-28 发布日期:2017-01-28
  • 作者简介:康宁(1963- ),女,博士,副教授,主要从事流体仿真方面的研究,kangning@buaa.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(NO.51175016)

RESEARCH ON PERMEABILITY PREDICTING FORMULA OF NON-CRIMPED FABRICS WITH FIBERS OF ELLIPSE EDGE

KANG Ning, LIANG Xuan-yong   

  1. School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2016-06-16 Online:2017-01-28 Published:2017-01-28

摘要: 将NCF的纤维束两侧近似为半椭圆,对NCF单胞设计五因素五水平正交试验,利用CFD方法得到渗透率的数值结果,进而拟合出预测渗透率的椭圆边公式。对于纤维束四方排列的NCF单胞,椭圆边公式的计算结果和数值结果平均误差为1.91%;对于六方排列,平均误差为1.90%。对NCF渗透率的预测结果和实验结果的相对误差为0.22%,小于矩形边公式的误差3.96%。当束间间距w1与椭圆边的半长轴c1之比小于0.8时,两预测公式值之比大于1.1。说明椭圆边公式对NCF材料渗透率的预测更加准确,适用范围更广。

关键词: RTM, 非弯折织物, 渗透率, 预测公式

Abstract: The results of CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) were applied to fit the ellipse edge formula for predicting permeability of NCF while the edge of fibers was approximated as semi-ellipse. Orthogonal tests of 5 factors and 5 levels were carried out on the NCF unit cell. The average error between numerical and the ellipse edge formula's results is 1.91% for quadratic arrangement and 1.90% for hexagonal arrangement. The error between experimental and the ellipse edge formula's result is 0.22%, which is smaller than the error of 3.96% between experimental and the rectangle edge formula's result. The ratio between the result of ellipse edge formula and rectangle edge formula is over 1.1, when the ratio between the width W1 between fiber bundles and the major semi-axis c1 of ellipse edge is less than 0.8. The results verified that the ellipse edge formula was more accurate and the application was broader.

Key words: RTM, non-crimped fabrics, permeability, predicting formula

中图分类号: