碳纤维复合材料开孔层合板压缩损伤预测和模型比较

玻璃钢/复合材料 ›› 2019, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (10): 33-39.

碳纤维复合材料开孔层合板压缩损伤预测和模型比较

唐荆^1,3,4,5, 陈啸², 杨科^1,3

1.中国科学院工程热物理研究所,北京100190;
2.丹麦科技大学风能学院,丹麦罗斯基勒4000;
3.中国科学院大学,北京100190;
4.国家能源风电叶片研发(实验)中心,北京100190;
5.中国科学院风能利用重点实验室,北京100190

收稿日期:2019-01-03 出版日期:2019-10-28 发布日期:2019-10-28
作者简介:唐荆(1991-),女,博士研究生,主要从事复合材料损伤和风电叶片结构性能等方面的研究,drtangjing@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(51405468)

DAMAGE PREDICTION AND MODELLING COMPARISON OF CARBON FIBER-REINFORCEDCOMPOSITE OPEN-HOLE LAMINATES UNDER COMPRESSION

TANG Jing^1,3,4,5, CHEN Xiao², YANG Ke^1,3

1.Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
2.Department of Wind Energy, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde 4000, Denmark;
3.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
4.National R&D center of wind turbine blade, Beijing 100190, China;
5.Key Laboratory of Wind Energy Utilization, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Received:2019-01-03 Online:2019-10-28 Published:2019-10-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对平面和弧面开孔层合板采用Abaqus有限元软件建立了壳单元、壳-胶层混合单元以及壳-实体混合单元有限元模型,并分别采用通用的Abaqus内置程序和自定义的用户子程序进行层合板压缩损伤分析。模型选取Hashin、改进Tsai-Wu和Quads失效准则分析了两种层合板在开孔压缩过程中的屈曲变形、层内失效及分层,并与文献中的试验进行对比。结果表明,本文所建的五种模型对弧面开孔层合板的强度预测误差均小于7%,且能捕捉到圆孔周围损伤起始以及承载力下降。仅依靠Abaqus程序内置Hashin失效准则的壳模型即可为弧面开孔层合板提供较为简单高效的强度评估,但在平面开孔层合板中采用改进Tsai-Wu失效准则的自定义子程序对强度和损伤预测更为可靠。

关键词: 复合材料, 开孔压缩, 有限元模型, 渐进损伤分析, 失效准则

Abstract: The finite element models of shell elements, shell-cohesive mixed elements and shell-solid mixed elements were developed in software Abaqus to model two open-hole composite laminates (OHC), i.e. flat OHC and cylindrical OHC. The universal Abaqus built-in software and proprietary user-subroutine were respectively adopted to analyze compressive damage. The buckling, intralaminar failure and delamination of both OHCs under compression were predicted by Hashin failure criteria, modified Tsai-Wu failure criteria and Quads failure criteria, then compared with experimental results. The results show that the predicted strength of cylindrical OHC is less than 7% error for proposed five models; the damage initiation around hole and loss of loading-carrying capacity can be captured by all models. The shell model solely relying on Abaqus software with built-in Hashin failure criteria can provide an effective strength assessment of cylindrical OHC, while user-subroutines with modified Tsai-Wu failure criteria can offer a more reliable alternative for flat OHC.

Key words: composite, open-hole compression, finite element model, progressive failure analysis, failure criteria

中图分类号:

TB332

唐荆, 陈啸, 杨科. 碳纤维复合材料开孔层合板压缩损伤预测和模型比较[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2019, 0(10): 33-39.

TANG Jing, CHEN Xiao, YANG Ke. DAMAGE PREDICTION AND MODELLING COMPARISON OF CARBON FIBER-REINFORCEDCOMPOSITE OPEN-HOLE LAMINATES UNDER COMPRESSION[J]. Fiber Reinforced Plastics/Composites, 2019, 0(10): 33-39.

参考文献

[1]Wisnom M R, Hallett S R, Soutis C. Scaling effects in notched composites. Journal of Composite Materials, 2010, 44(2): 195-210.
[2] Chang F K, Lessard L B. Damage tolerance of laminated composites containing an open hole and subjected to compressive loadings: Part Ⅱ-Experiment. Journal of Composite Materials, 1991, 25: 44-64.
[3] Engelstad S P, Reddy J N, Knight N F. Postbuckling response and failure prediction of graphite-epoxy plates loaded in compression. AIAA Journal, 1992, 30: 2106-2113.
[4] Knight N F, Starnes J H. Postbuckling behavior of axially compressed graphite-epoxy cylindrical panels with circular holes. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 1985, 107(4): 394-402.
[5] Chang F K, Lessard L B. Damage tolerance of laminated composites containing an open hole and subjected to compressive loadings: Part Ⅰ-Analysis. Journal of Composite Materials, 1991, 25: 2-43.
[6] Su Z C, Tay T E, Ridha M, et al. Progressive damage modeling of open-hole composite laminates under compression. Composite Structures, 2015, 122: 507-517.
[7] Xie D, Biggers S B. Postbuckling analysis with progressive damage modeling in tailored laminated plates and shells with a cutout. Composite Structures, 2003, 59(2): 199-216.
[8] 关志东, 黎增山, 刘德博, 等. 复合材料层板开孔压缩损伤分析. 复合材料学报, 2012, 29(3): 167-172.
[9] Orifici A C, Herszberg I, Thomson R S. Review of methodologies for composite material modelling incorporating failure. Composite Structures, 2008, 86(1-3): 194-210.
[10] Riccio A, Costabzo C D, Gennaro P D, et al. Intra-laminar progressive failure analysis of composite laminates with a large notch damage. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2017, 73: 97-112.
[11] Reinoso J, Catalanotti G, Blazquez A, et al. A consistent anisotropic damage model for laminated fiber-reinforced composites using the 3D-version of the Puck failure criterion. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2017, 126-127: 37-53.
[12] Chen J F, Morozov E V, Shankar K. Simulating progressive failure of composite laminates including in-ply and delamination damage effects. Composites Part A, 2014, 61: 185-200.
[13] Turon A, Davila C G, Camanho P P, et al. An engineering solution for mesh size effects in the simulation of delamination using cohesive zone models. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2007, 74(10): 1665-1682.
[14] Hashin Z. Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1980, 47(2): 329-334.
[15] Tsai S W, Wu E M. A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials. Journal of Composite Materials, 1971, 5(1): 58-80.
[16] Chen X, Zhao X L, Xu J Z. Revisiting the structural collapse of a 52.3 m composite wind turbine blade in a full-scale bending test. Wind Energy, 2017, 20(6): 1111-1127.
[17] Christensen R M. The theory of material failure. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2013.
[18] Starnes J H, Rouse M. Postbuckling and failure characteristics of selected flat rectangular graphite-epoxy plates loaded in compression//22nd Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. 1981.
[19] Falzon B G, Apruzzese P. Numerical analysis of intralaminar failure mechanisms in composite structures. Part Ⅱ: Applications. Composite Structures, 2011, 93(2): 1047-1053.