玻璃纤维增强热塑性树脂复合材料界面表征方法的研究

玻璃钢/复合材料 ›› 2019, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (5): 77-82.

玻璃纤维增强热塑性树脂复合材料界面表征方法的研究

姜焕英¹, 王大鹏¹, 王志明¹, 王庆昭^1*

1.山东科技大学化学与环境工程学院,青岛266290;
2.山东玻纤集团股份有限公司,临沂276000

收稿日期:2019-02-12 出版日期:2019-05-28 发布日期:2019-05-28
通讯作者: 王庆昭(1962-),男,博士,教授,主要从事高分子材料加工方面的研究,qzhwang001@126.com
作者简介:姜焕英(1992-),女,硕士,主要从事玻璃纤维复合材料界面方面的研究

STUDY ON INTERFACE CHARACTERIZATION METHOD OF GLASS FIBERREINFORCED THERMOPLASTIC RESIN COMPOSITES

JIANG Huan-ying¹, WANG Da-peng¹, WANG Zhi-ming¹, WANG Qing-zhao^1*

1.Shandong University of Science and Technology, School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering,Qingdao 266290, China;
2.Shandong Fiberglass Group Co., Ltd., Linyi 276000, China

Received:2019-02-12 Online:2019-05-28 Published:2019-05-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 玻璃纤维复合材料的界面性能是影响复合材料整体力学性能的关键因素。本文提出利用剥离试验表征玻璃纤维增强热塑性树脂复合材料界面粘结强度,并结合红外光谱、接触角、扫描电镜进行表征的方法。结果表明:实验室制备的玻璃片与玻璃纤维原丝浸润剂处理前后红外图谱对比发现,红外特征峰硅羟基峰位、定量分析结果基本一致;浸润剂处理前后的玻璃片接触角分别为41.01°、52.71°,表面疏水性明显增大,可以更好地被树脂浸润;剥离试验曲线与其他界面表征试验的脱粘趋势相似,亦符合剥离曲线的基本趋势,浸润剂处理前后玻璃片与聚乙烯树脂间的平均剥离力增大84.67%,浸润剂处理表面后,复合材料界面的粘结力明显增大。因此,将剥离试验用于探究玻璃纤维热塑性复合材料的界面粘结性能具有一定的可行性。

关键词: 玻璃纤维复合材料, 剥离试验, 界面性能

Abstract: The interfacial properties of glass fiber composites are the key factors affecting the overall mechanical properties of composites. In this paper, the interfacial bonding strength of glass fiber reinforced thermoplastic resin composites was characterized by peeling test, and the surface characterization was carried out by infrared spectroscopy, contact angle and scanning electron microscopy. The results show that the infrared spectrum of the glass flakes prepared by the laboratory and the glass fiber precursor sizing agent before and after treatment showed that the peaks of the silicon characteristic peaks of the infrared characteristic peaks and the quantitative analysis results were basically the same. The contact angles of the front and back glass sheets are 41.01°and 52.71°, respectively. The surface hydrophobicity is obviously increased, which can be better infiltrated by the resin. The peeling test curve is similar to the debonding tendency of other interface characterization tests, and also conforms to the basic trend of the peeling curve. The average peeling force between the glass sheet and the polyethylene resin before and after the sizing treatment is increased by 84.67%. After the sizing treatment of the surface of the composite material, the adhesion of the interface is significantly increased. Therefore, it is feasible to use the peel test to characterize the interfacial adhesion properties of glass fiber thermoplastic composites.

Key words: glass fiber composite, peel test, interface performance

中图分类号:

TB332

姜焕英, 王大鹏, 王志明, 王庆昭. 玻璃纤维增强热塑性树脂复合材料界面表征方法的研究[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2019, 0(5): 77-82.

JIANG Huan-ying, WANG Da-peng, WANG Zhi-ming, WANG Qing-zhao. STUDY ON INTERFACE CHARACTERIZATION METHOD OF GLASS FIBERREINFORCED THERMOPLASTIC RESIN COMPOSITES[J]. Fiber Reinforced Plastics/Composites, 2019, 0(5): 77-82.

参考文献

[1] 程醉. 任重道远, 玻璃纤维行业不是春天亦见花[J]. 中国纤检, 2012(13): 20-23.
[2] 王冬至. 玻璃纤维浸润剂分子设计及其对复合材料界面性能的影响[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2014.
[3] 秦文贞, 于俊荣, 贺建强, 等. 纤维增强复合材料界面剪切强度及界面微观结构的表征[J]. 高分子通报, 2013(2): 14-22.
[4] 刘政, 翟哲, 刘东杰, 等. 纤维树脂基复合材料微观界面性能表征方法的进展[J]. 纤维复合材料, 2014(2): 36-40.
[5] 邓李慧, 陈淙洁, 陈师, 等. 微拉曼光谱研究碳纤维/微滴和聚乙烯纤维/微滴的微观力学行为[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2015(1): 23-27.
[6] 何东. 玻璃纤维的制备技术及存在问题[J]. 中国棉花加工, 2017(1): 42-43.
[7] Liu B, Liu Z, Wang X, et al. Interfacial shear strength of carbon fiber reinforced polyphenylene sulfide measured by the microbond test[J]. Polymer Testing, 2013, 32(4): 724-730.
[8] Gundel D B, Majumdar B S, Miracle D B. Evaluation of the transverse response of fiber-reinforced composites using a cross-shaped sample geometry[J]. Scripta Metallurgica Et Materialia, 1995, 33(12): 2057-2065.
[9] Yun S H , Cho D , Kim J , et al. Effect of silane coupling agents with different organo-functional groups on the interfacial shear strength of glass fiber/Nylon 6 composites[J]. Journal of Materials Science Letters, 2003, 22(22): 1591-1594.
[10] Moon C K, Holmes G A, Mcdonough W G. Study on the interfacial properties of two-dimensionally arranged glass fiber/epoxy resin model composites[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2006, 99(4): 1541-1551.
[11] Zhang L, Wang J. A generalized cohesive zone model of the peel test for pressure-sensitive adhesives[J]. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives, 2009, 29(3): 217-224.
[12] 刘其林, 黄颖瑜, 邓伟文, 等. 双面胶带剥离强度测试的影响因素[J]. 粘接, 2017(5): 48-53.
[13] Eitner U, Rendler L C. The mechanical theory behind the peel test[J]. Energy Procedia, 2014, 55: 331-335.
[14] 胶粘剂180°剥离强度试验方法挠性材料对刚性材料: GB/T 2790—1995[S].
[15] 王维, 谢俊, 何峰, 等. ER玻璃纤维结构和表面性能的研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报, 2014, 36(3): 28-32.
[16] 王长伟, 陈敏, 李家桐, 等. 玻璃纤维偶联剂改性制备固定化载体[J]. 大连工业大学学报, 2012, 31(3): 70-73.
[17] 王承遇, 陶瑛. 玻璃的表面结构和性质[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 1982(1): 26-36.
[18] 李亚楠, 戴亚辉, 阎新萍. Origin8.0实现聚合物共混物红外光谱定量分析的数据处理[J]. 塑料, 2014, 43(4): 110-113.
[19] 刘泽宇, 张乐涛, 何伟, 等. GF表面的多步接枝改性及其对PP/GF复合材料拉伸性能的影响[J]. 工程塑料应用, 2015, 43(4): 103-108.
[20] 杨斌, 章继峰, 梁文彦, 等. 玻璃纤维表面纳米SiO₂改性对GF/PCBT复合材料力学性能的影响[J]. 复合材料学报, 2015, 32(3): 691-698.