BFRP侧向约束对GFRP带肋筋与混凝土粘结性能的影响

复合材料科学与工程 ›› 2020, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4): 5-12.

• 基础研究 • 下一篇

BFRP侧向约束对GFRP带肋筋与混凝土粘结性能的影响

王言磊¹, 王密锋¹, 张学¹, 许清风²

1.大连理工大学土木工程学院,大连116024;
2.上海市建筑科学研究院上海市工程结构安全重点实验室,上海200032

收稿日期:2019-10-29 出版日期:2020-04-28 发布日期:2020-04-28
作者简介:王言磊(1978-),男,博士,副教授,主要从事FRP在土木工程中应用方面的研究,wangyanlei@dlut.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0703000);国家自然科学基金面上项目(51778102, 51978126);中央高校基本科研业务费项目(DUT18LK35);辽宁省自然科学基金项目(20180550763);上海市工程结构安全重点实验室开放课题(2018-KF04, 2019-KF03)

EFFECTS OF BFRP LATERAL CONFINEMENT ON BOND BEHAVIORBETWEEN GFRP RIBBED BARS AND CONCRETE

WANG Yan-lei¹, WANG Mi-feng¹, ZHANG Xue¹, XU Qing-feng²

1.School of Civil Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China;
2.Shanghai Key Laboratory of Engineering Structure Safety, SRIBS, Shanghai 200032, China

Received:2019-10-29 Online:2020-04-28 Published:2020-04-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为考察BFRP侧向约束对GFRP带肋筋与混凝土粘结性能的影响,对36个GFRP筋混凝土拉拔试件进行试验研究,主要试验参数为BFRP侧向约束层数(0层、1层、2层和3层)和混凝土相对保护层厚度c/d(1.6、2.2和3.0)。试验结果表明:BFRP侧向约束使拉拔试件的破坏模式由混凝土劈裂破坏转为GFRP带肋筋的拔出破坏;试件的粘结强度和达到粘结强度所对应的滑移量、侧向约束应力会随BFRP侧向约束层数的增加而增大;相同BFRP侧向约束层数下,相对粘结强度随着c/d的增大而增大,但达到粘结强度所对应的侧向约束应力却随c/d的增大呈指数减小;相对粘结强度增加量随着达到粘结强度时侧向约束应力的增加呈对数增加。

关键词: 纤维增强复材筋, 粘结性能, 侧向约束, 相对保护层厚度, 粘结-滑移关系, 复合材料

Abstract: A total of 36 pull-out specimens were tested to evaluate the bond behavior between GFRP ribbed bars and BFRP-confined concrete. Test parameters included BFRP layers (0 ply, 1 ply, 2 plies and 3 plies) and the concrete cover to bar diameter ratio c/d (1.6, 2.2 and 3.0). The test results indicated that the typical failure mode of the specimens was changed from brittle splitting failure to ductile pull-out failure due to the lateral confinement of BFRP. The bond strength and the corresponding slip as well as confining stress were increased with the increasing number of BFRP layers. Based on the same BFRP confinement, normalized bond strength was increased with the increase of c/d, while the confining stress corresponding to bond strength was increased exponentially with the deceasing c/d. A logarithmical relationship was observed between the increment of normalized bond strength and the confining stress of BFRP corresponding to the bond strength.

Key words: FRP bar, bond behavior, lateral confinement, concrete cover to bar diameter ratio, bond stress-slip relationship, composite

中图分类号:

TB332

王言磊, 王密锋, 张学, 许清风. BFRP侧向约束对GFRP带肋筋与混凝土粘结性能的影响[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2020, 0(4): 5-12.

WANG Yan-lei, WANG Mi-feng, ZHANG Xue, XU Qing-feng. EFFECTS OF BFRP LATERAL CONFINEMENT ON BOND BEHAVIORBETWEEN GFRP RIBBED BARS AND CONCRETE[J]. Composites Science and Engineering, 2020, 0(4): 5-12.

参考文献

[1] ACI Committee 440. Guide for the design and construction of concrete reinforced with FRP bars: ACI 440.1R—15[S]. Detroit: American Concrete Institute, 2015.
[2] 黄华, 郝润奇, 黄敏. FRP筋混凝土结构的研究现状分析[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2018(7): 108-116.
[3] 张卫东, 王振波, 孙文彬. FRP筋与混凝土粘结性能研究进展[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2015(9): 99-103.
[4] 尹甜甜, 刘华新, 孔祥清, 等. BFRP筋与玄武岩纤维再生混凝土粘结性能[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2017(6): 68-74.
[5] Baena M, Torres L, Turon A, et al. Experimental study of bond behaviour between concrete and FRP bars using a pull-out test[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2009, 40(8): 784-797.
[6] Ashrafi H, Bazli M, Oskouei A V. Enhancement of bond characteristics of ribbed-surface GFRP bars with concrete by using carbon fiber mat anchorage[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 134: 507-519.
[7] Veljkovic A, Carvelli V, Haffke M M, et al. Concrete cover effect on the bond of GFRP bar and concrete under static loading[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2017, 124: 40-53.
[8] 郝庆多, 王言磊, 侯吉林, 等. GFRP 带肋筋粘结性能试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2008, 25(10): 158-165.
[9] Golafshani E M, Rahai A, Sebt M H. Bond behavior of steel and GFRP bars in self-compacting concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2014, 61: 230-240.
[10] Hossain K M A, Ametrano D, Lachemi M. Bond strength of GFRP bars in ultra-high strength concrete using RILEM beam tests[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2017, 10: 69-79.
[11] Gu X, Yu B, Wu M. Experimental study of the bond performance and mechanical response of GFRP reinforced concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 114: 407-415.
[12] CSA Standard. Design and construction of building components with fibre reinforced polymers: CSA S806-12[S]. Toronto: Canadian Standards Association, 2012.
[13] Hamad B S, Rteil A A, Soudki K A. Bond strength of tension lap splices in high-strength concrete beams strengthened with glass fiber reinforced polymer wraps[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2004, 8(1): 14-21.
[14] Hamad B S, Rteil A A, Salwan B R, et al. Behavior of bond-critical regions wrapped with fiber-reinforced polymer sheets in normal and high-strength concrete[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2004, 8(3): 248-257.
[15] Hamad B S, Soudki K A, Harajli M H, et al. Experimental and analytical evaluation of bond strength of reinforcement in fiber-reinforced polymer-wrapped high-strength concrete beams[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2004, 101(6): 747-754.
[16] Harajli M H. Effect of confinement using steel, FRC, or FRP on the bond stress-slip response of steel bars under cyclic loading[J]. Materials and Structures, 2006, 39(6): 621-634.
[17] Harajli M H. Numerical bond analysis using experimentally derived local bond laws: A powerful method for evaluating the bond strength of steel bars[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2007, 133(5): 695-705.
[18] Harajli M H, Hamad B S, Rteil A A. Effect of confinement on bond strength between steel bars and concrete[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2004, 101(5): 595-603.
[19] Zhou Y, Dang L, Sui L, et al. Experimental study on the bond behavior between corroded rebar and concrete under dual action of FRP confinement and sustained loading[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 155: 605-616.
[20] ACI Committee 408. Bond and development of straight reinforcing bars in tension: ACI 408.3R-09[S]. Detroit: American Concrete Institute, 2009.
[21] 张志金, 刘华新, 李庆文, 等. 无腹筋BFRP筋混凝土深梁受剪性能研究[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2019(1): 36-41.
[22] Esfahani M R, Kianoush M R, Lachemi M. Bond strength of glass fibre reinforced polymer reinforcing bars in normal and self-consolidating concrete [J]. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2005, 32(3):553-560.
[23] Lam L, Teng J G. Design-oriented stress-strain model for FRP-confined concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2003, 17(6-7): 471-489.

BFRP侧向约束对GFRP带肋筋与混凝土粘结性能的影响

EFFECTS OF BFRP LATERAL CONFINEMENT ON BOND BEHAVIORBETWEEN GFRP RIBBED BARS AND CONCRETE

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李辉, 赵春江, 梁建国, 曾光, 王蕊, 边强. 变刚度复合材料层合板力学特性及失效机理分析[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2022, 0(7): 5-10.
[2]	宫唯康, 刘晓阳, 荆玉才, 项俊宁, 李相国, 杨国涛. 预应力CFRP板加固钢-混凝土组合梁受弯性能的有限元分析[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2022, 0(7): 11-19.
[3]	赵雄翔, 孙鹏文, 李建东. 基于应变能的风力机叶片铺层结构优化设计[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2022, 0(7): 20-24.
[4]	冯钰茹, 王军利, 张宝军, 刘志远, 李金洋, 张宝升. 复合材料叶片建模及铺层参数对强度的影响分析[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2022, 0(7): 25-31.
[5]	常腾飞, 湛利华, 李树健, 潘阳. 不同成型方法的树脂基复合材料帽形结构共固化成型质量研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2022, 0(7): 32-38.
[6]	黄东辉, 曾少华. 自组装蒙脱土-碳纳米管对玻纤增强复合材料力学及界面性能的影响[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2022, 0(7): 39-44.
[7]	满珈诚, 侯进森, 李哲夫, 岳广全, 徐鹏, 姜碧羽, 刘卫平. 连续碳纤维增强热固性预浸料压实性能的试验研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2022, 0(7): 45-51.
[8]	林梅, 张铁军, 冯宇, 王旗, 武梦科. 湿热/干燥环境交替作用下碳纤维复合材料的吸湿/脱湿特性[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2022, 0(7): 52-59.
[9]	高慧, 罗发, 渠永平, 王春海. SiC_f/Al₂O₃/Mullite复合材料的制备及吸波性能[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2022, 0(7): 60-65.
[10]	王东萍. 磁性聚吡咯基复合材料吸附电镀废水中铜离子[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2022, 0(7): 66-70.
[11]	鲁晓锋, 张颜明, 蒙丹, 苏成功. 全尺寸叶片静力测试中ANSYS梁模型应用与研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2022, 0(7): 71-74.
[12]	宦胜民, 黄小波, 杨润苗, 向萌. 超支化不饱和聚酯的制备及其应用研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2022, 0(7): 75-80.
[13]	王雅娜, 赵魏. 复合材料Ⅱ型分层ENF试验数据处理方法对比分析[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2022, 0(7): 81-92.
[14]	田会方, 张国武, 吴迎峰, 任政. 水处理罐缠绕工艺中玻璃纤维团打结装置设计与分析[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2022, 0(7): 93-98.
[15]	冯倩倩, 朱方龙. 聚合物辅助沉积法制备导电玄武岩纤维[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2022, 0(7): 99-102.