玻璃纤维增强聚乙烯树脂热塑性复合材料的冲击定位

复合材料科学与工程 ›› 2020, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (7): 85-92.

玻璃纤维增强聚乙烯树脂热塑性复合材料的冲击定位

汪晗¹, 倪爱清², 王继辉^1*, 陈宏达¹

1.武汉理工大学材料科学与工程学院,武汉430070;
2.武汉理工大学复合新技术国家重点实验室,武汉430070

收稿日期:2019-10-29 出版日期:2020-07-28 发布日期:2020-07-28
通讯作者: 王继辉(1962-),博士,教授,主要从事聚合物基复合材料结构方面的研究,jhwang@whut.edu.cn。
作者简介:汪晗(1994-),男,硕士,主要从事聚合物基复合材料方面的研究。

IMPACT LOCALIZATION OF GLASS FIBER REINFORCED POLYETHYLENE THERMOPLASTIC COMPOSITE

WANG Han¹, NI Ai-qing², WANG Ji-hui^1*, CHEN Hong-da¹

1. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China

Received:2019-10-29 Online:2020-07-28 Published:2020-07-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为解决玻璃纤维增强聚乙烯树脂复合材料(CGF/PE)层合板的冲击定位问题,本文提出了基于光纤传感方法和相关系数法的冲击定位方法。首先将连续的实验区域划分为面积相等的9个部分,进行冲击定位实验,由光纤Bragg光栅(FBG)收集冲击响应信号,经小波阈值方法进行降噪,提取中心波长变化最大值处的时域特征信号,根据计算得到的时域信号相关系数的大小实现对冲击点的定位。结果表明,对于初始划分区域的层合板冲击实验,该方法的冲击定位预测准确率为100%,有效验证了该方法的可靠性。接着,进一步细分实验区域,对该方法的实验精度进行了探究,结果表明,在细分区域的层合板冲击实验中,在70 mm和23.3 mm尺度上,该方法的冲击定位精度达100%,在11.6 mm尺度上达到了87.5%。最后对3种能量下冲击点定位准确率进行了探究,结果表明,70 mm和23.3 mm尺度上准确率达到100%,11.6 mm尺度上达到了87.5%,因此该方法显示出较高的冲击定位预测准确率和工程应用价值。

关键词: 热塑性复合材料, 光纤传感, 时域特征信号, 冲击定位, 相关系数法

Abstract: As far as the application of glass fiber reinforced polyethylene thermoplastic composite (CGF/PE) is concerned, an online impact localization method was presented here based on optic fiber sensing and correlation coefficient method. First, the total experimental impact area of the glass fiber reinforced polyethylene thermoplastic composite laminate was divided into nine parts with equal areas. The impact response signals were collected by fiber Bragg grating (FBG) and de-noised by wavelet threshold method. Then, the time domain characteristic signals were collected at the maximum variances of the central wavelengths and the correlation coefficients of the time domain signals were calculated for impact localization. The result shows that 100% prediction accuracy is achieved for the composite laminate with initial divisions by online impact localization method proposed. Thereafter,the experimental area was subdivided in order to examine the prediction precision of the method. And the results show that the accuracy of 100% is achieved for 70 mm and 23.3 mm scales and 87.5% for 11.6 mm. Finally, the accuracy of the impact point location under three kinds of energies is explored. The results show that the accuracy rate on the 70 mm and 23.3 mm scales is 100%, and the scale on the 11.6 mm scale is 87.5%. High prediction accuracy with good precision is achieved by this method and its application in industry is truly promising.

Key words: thermoplastic composites, optical fiber sensing, time domain characteristic signal, impact localization, correlation coefficient method

中图分类号:

TB332

汪晗, 倪爱清, 王继辉, 陈宏达. 玻璃纤维增强聚乙烯树脂热塑性复合材料的冲击定位[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2020, 0(7): 85-92.

WANG Han, NI Ai-qing, WANG Ji-hui, CHEN Hong-da. IMPACT LOCALIZATION OF GLASS FIBER REINFORCED POLYETHYLENE THERMOPLASTIC COMPOSITE[J]. Composites Science and Engineering, 2020, 0(7): 85-92.

参考文献

[1]王耀先. 复合材料力学与结构设计[M]. 上海: 华东理工大学出版社, 2012: 6.
[2]张璇, 沈真. 航空航天领域先进复合材料制造技术进展[J]. 纺织导报, 2018(S1): 74-81.
[3]于勤勤, 季伟, 江雅珍, 等. 热塑性复合材料在重型汽车上的应用研究[J]. 重型汽车, 2018(1): 12-14, 21.
[4]张萌萌, 陈平, 王欣. 微-介孔复合材料在石油化工领域中的应用[J]. 精细石油化工, 2018, 205(4): 80-86.
[5]牟书香, 贾智源, 邱桂杰, 等. 热塑性复合材料风电叶片的研究进展[J]. 新材料产业, 2011(11): 1-5.
[6]黄宝元, 陶岳杰, 冯济斌, 等. 增强热塑性塑料复合管道研究进展及其应用现状[J]. 新型建筑材料, 2017(1): 71-76.
[7]Frieden J, Cugnoni J, Botsis J, et al. Low energy impact damage monitoring of composites using dynamic strain signals from FBG sensors-Part Ⅱ: Damage identification[J]. Composite Structures, 2012, 94(2): 593-600.
[8]Lu J, Wang B, Liang D. Wavelet packet energy characterization of low velocity impacts and load localization by optical fiber Bragg grating sensor technique[J]. Applied Optics, 2013, 52(11): 2346.
[9]Ghajari M, Sharif K Z, Aliabadi M H. Impact detection using artificial neural networks[J]. Key Engineering Materials, 2011, 488-489: 767-770.
[10]Jiang M S, Sai Y Z, Geng X Y, et al. Development of an FBG sensor array for multi-impact source localization on CFRP structures[J]. Sensors, 2016, 16(10): 1770.
[11]Pedro O, Virginia I, et al. Detection of multiple low-energy impact damage in composite plates using Lamb wave techniques[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2015, 80: 291-298.
[12]钟永腾, 袁慎芳, 邱雷. 基于梅花阵列的复合材料全方位冲击定位方法[J]. 复合材料学报, 2014, 31(5): 1369-1374.
[13]苏永振, 袁慎芳, 周恒保. 基于三角测量和最优化技术的复合材料冲击定位位两步法[J]. 宇航学报, 2009, 30(3): 1201-1206.
[14]Xu J, Deng J. Study on Lamb wave dispersion curves for the testing of metal plates[C]//International Conference on Life System Modeling and Simulation International Conference on Intelligent Computing for Sustainable Energy and Environment. 2017.
[15]Ciampa F,Meo M. Acoustic emission source localization and velocity determination of the fundamental mode A0 using wavelet analysis and Newton-based optimization technique[J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 2010, 19(4): 045027.
[16]苏永振. 航空材料结构低速冲击健康监测研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2010.
[17]Rezayat A, De P B, Lamberti A, et al. Reconstruction of impacts on a composite plate using fiber Bragg gratings (FBG) and inverse methods[J]. Composite Structures, 2016, S0263822316302276.
[18]Sung D U, Oh J H, Kim C G, et al. Impact monitoring of smart composite laminates using neural network and wavelet analysis[J]. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2000, 11(3): 180-190.
[19]黄红梅, 袁慎芳, 常琦. 基于光纤Bragg光栅和支持向量机的冲击损伤识别研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2010, 29(10): 53-55.
[20]Jang B W, Lee Y G, Kim J H, et al. Real-time impact identification algorithm for composite structures using fiber Bragg gratingsen-sors[J]. Structural Control & Health Monitoring, 2012, aop(aop): 0-0.
[21]徐丹. 光纤传感器应变监测的应用研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2010.