流场稳定性及烧蚀时间对玻璃钢材料烧蚀性能的影响研究

复合材料科学与工程 ›› 2021, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1): 97-101.

流场稳定性及烧蚀时间对玻璃钢材料烧蚀性能的影响研究

张蕾, 江柏红, 吴宪, 彭广瑞, 原涛

航天特种材料及工艺技术研究所,北京100074

收稿日期:2020-03-24 出版日期:2021-01-28 发布日期:2021-01-25
作者简介:张蕾(1990-),女,硕士,工程师,主要从事理化性能测试及失效分析方面的研究,hmyzzl0702@126.com。

STUDY OF THE STABILITY OF FLOW FIELD AND STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF ABLATION TIME ON ABLATION PROPERTIES OF FRP

ZHANG Lei, JIANG Bai-hong, WU Xian, PENG Guang-rui, YUAN Tao

Research Institute of Aerospace Special Materials and Technology, Beijing 100074, China

Received:2020-03-24 Online:2021-01-28 Published:2021-01-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文以模压玻璃钢材料为研究对象,模拟材料高温烧蚀环境,以氧-丙烷焰流为热源,拟定测试方案,对材料进行烧蚀试验。探究在不同的热流密度值下,烧蚀距离对流场稳定性的影响,发现当热流密度值≥1.0 MW/m²时,烧蚀距离改变,热流密度值波动较小,流场稳定性较好。探究烧蚀时间对玻璃钢材料烧蚀性能的影响,分析材料表面形貌变化的原因,发现随着烧蚀时间延长,质量烧蚀率明显下降,材料的线烧蚀率和质量烧蚀率一致性较差,这是因为在较短的烧蚀时间内,模压玻璃钢材料分层膨胀导致线烧蚀率较小,但薄弱的炭层结构会导致材料质量下降明显,质量烧蚀率较大。随着烧蚀时间从60 s升至120 s,材料分层积聚导致材料强度相对增大,抗冲刷能力增强,质量烧蚀率下降。并且在材料可承受的范围内,较长的烧蚀时间才能相对准确地反映材料的线烧蚀率。

关键词: 热流密度, 流场稳定性, 烧蚀时间, 线烧蚀率, 质量烧蚀率

Abstract: In this paper, the molded FRP material was taken as the research object, the high temperature ablation environment of the material was simulated by the oxygen propane torch flame test. Drew up the experiment plan and then started the experiment to FRP. The influence of ablation distance on the stability of flow field was studied under different heat flux values. It was found that when the heat flux value was greater than 1.0 MW/m², the ablative distance had less influence on the fluctuation of heat flux value, and the stability of the flow field was better. The influence of ablation time on the ablative performance of FRP was explored, and the reasons for the change of the surface morphology of FRP were analyzed. It was found that with the prolongation of ablation time, the mass ablation rate decreased significantly, and the consistency between the linear ablation rate and the mass ablation rate was poor. This was because the layered expansion of the molded FRP during the shorter ablation time resulted in the smaller linear ablation rate, but the weak carbon layer structure would result in the decrease of the quality of the material obviously. So the mass ablation rate was high. With the increase of ablation time from 60 seconds to 120 seconds, the layered accumulation of materials lead to the increase of material strength. The enhancement of erosion resistance decreased the mass ablation rate. Within the acceptable range of materials, the longer ablation time can accurately reflect the linear ablation rate of the material.

Key words: heat flux, stability of flow field, ablation time, liner ablation rate, mass ablation rate

中图分类号:

TB332

张蕾, 江柏红, 吴宪, 彭广瑞, 原涛. 流场稳定性及烧蚀时间对玻璃钢材料烧蚀性能的影响研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2021, 0(1): 97-101.

ZHANG Lei, JIANG Bai-hong, WU Xian, PENG Guang-rui, YUAN Tao. STUDY OF THE STABILITY OF FLOW FIELD AND STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF ABLATION TIME ON ABLATION PROPERTIES OF FRP[J]. COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 0(1): 97-101.

参考文献

[1] 闫联生, 傅立坤, 刘晓红. 树脂基防热材料烧蚀性能表征的探讨[J]. 固体火箭技术, 2003, 26(2): 53-56.
[2] 杨鑫, 苏哲安, 黄启忠, 等. C/C-ZrC复合材料高温氧乙炔焰烧蚀性能及机理研究[J]. 中国材料进展, 2011, 30(11): 32-38.
[3] 俞继军, 马志强, 姜贵庆, 等. C/C复合材料烧蚀形貌测量及烧蚀机理分析[J]. 宇航材料工艺, 2003, 33(1): 36-39.
[4] 靳亮, 王德, 王耀辉, 等. 热防护材料烧蚀性能测试方法研究[J]. 固体火箭技术, 2018, 41(2): 245-250.
[5] 邹军锋, 李文静, 刘斌, 等. 飞行器用热防护材料发展趋势[J]. 宇航材料工艺, 2015(4): 10-15.
[6] 矫利闯. 防热材料动态烧蚀率测试方法研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2013.
[7] 尹昌平. 共注射RTM制备承载/隔热/防热一体化复合材料[D]. 长沙: 国防科学技术大学研究生院, 2009.
[8] 孙翔宇, 张炜, 胡淑芳, 等. 绝热材料动态烧蚀试验方法[J]. 推进技术, 2011, 32(4): 597-600.
[9] 李婷, 刘建军, 杨学军, 等. 一种RTM用耐烧蚀改性酚醛树脂性能研究[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2015(7): 18-21.
[10] 李建伟, 尹昌平, 曾竞成, 等. RTM成型石英/钡酚醛耐烧蚀复合材料及性能研究[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2009(3): 41-44.
[11] 王书贤, 何国强, 李江, 等. 不同燃气环境下硅橡胶绝热材料烧蚀特性试验研究[J]. 固体火箭技术, 2009, 32(5): 583-587.
[12] 张劲松, 凌玲, 何永祝, 等. 试验条件对EPDM绝热层耐烧蚀性能的影响[J]. 固体火箭技术, 2004, 27(2): 121-122.
[13] 胡明轩, 王俊, 李阿凤, 等. 烧蚀材料烧蚀试验方法: GJB 323A—1996[S].
[14] 吴皇, 易茂中, 周文艳, 等. ZrC-Cu-C/C复合材料的烧蚀性能烧蚀机制[J]. 复合材料学报, 2017, 34(1): 152-159.
[15] 张春梅, 杜华太, 庞明磊, 等. 影响纤维/橡胶材料烧蚀率的因素初探[J]. 制造技术研究, 2012(3): 36-39.
[16] 全文华, 肖永栋, 徐戈, 等. 高强度耐烧蚀材料工艺性能研究[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2009(4): 80-82.