基于渐进损伤数值模拟的复合材料气瓶爆破压强优化

复合材料科学与工程 ›› 2020, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (8): 25-31.

基于渐进损伤数值模拟的复合材料气瓶爆破压强优化

贾子璇¹, 林松^2*, 贾晓龙¹, 杨小平¹

1.北京化工大学材料学院,北京100029;
2.北华航天工业学院材料科学与工程学院,廊坊065000

收稿日期:2019-10-29 出版日期:2020-08-28 发布日期:2020-08-28
通讯作者: 林松(1983-),男,高级工程师,研究方向为树脂基复合材料,linsong28@126.com。
作者简介:贾子璇(1995-),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为复合材料有限元模拟。
基金资助:
陕西省重点研发计划项目(2019TSLGY04-03)

OPTIMIZATION OF COMPOSITE CYLINDER BURST PRESSURE BASED ON PROGRESSIVE DAMAGE NUMERICAL SIMULATION

JIA Zi-xuan¹, LIN Song^2*, JIA Xiao-long¹, YANG Xiao-ping¹

1. College of Material, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China;
2. College of Material Engineering, North China Institute of Aerospace Engineering, Langfang 065000, China

Received:2019-10-29 Online:2020-08-28 Published:2020-08-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文针对金属内衬复合材料气瓶进行渐进损伤的数值模拟并根据不同铺层方案气瓶的爆破结果进行优化选择。在ABAQUS软件中建立了气瓶模型,选用Hashin失效准则和Tan退化模型提出了渐进损伤理论,通过编写USDFLD子程序实现对复合材料模型渐进损伤的预测过程,并使用NOL环验证了损伤理论的准确性;对不同铺层方式的气瓶分别进行爆破结果的预测和渐进损伤分析。NOL环拉伸破坏结果表明,模拟得到的破坏应力与实际值的误差为1.9%,证明了渐进损伤理论用于环形缠绕模型是可行的。气瓶的爆破预测结果表明,预测的压力和失效位置与真实试验结果很接近。不同铺层的气瓶的爆破结果比较表明,铺层角度和数量对气瓶爆破压力及位置有较大影响。气瓶的渐进损伤分析结果表明,复合材料气瓶的损伤是一个从基体开裂逐渐过渡到分层缺陷,最终导致纤维断裂和气瓶爆破的过程。

关键词: 复合材料气瓶, 数值模拟, 渐进损伤分析

Abstract: In this paper, the numerical simulation of progressive damage is carried out for the cylinder with metal liner and the optimization is carried out according to the burst results of the cylinder with different layer schemes. The cylinder model was established in ABAQUS software, the Hashin failure criterion and Tan degradation model were selected to put forward the progressive damage theory, and the USDFLD subroutine was written to realize the prediction process of progressive damage of composite model, and the accuracy of the damage theory was verified by NOL ring. The prediction of burst results and progressive damage analysis were carried out for cylinders with different layers modes. The tensile failure results of NOL ring show that the error between the simulated failure stress and the actual value is 1.9%, which proves that the theory of progressive damage is feasible for the circular winding model. The prediction results of cylinder burst show that the predicted pressure and failure position are close to the real test results. The comparison of burst results of cylinders with different layers shows that the angle and number of layers have a great influence on the bursting pressure and position of cylinders. The results of progressive damage analysis show that the damage of composite cylinder is a process from matrix cracking to delamination defect, which consequently leads to fiber fracture and cylinder burst.

Key words: composite cylinder, numerical simulation, progressive damage analysis

中图分类号:

TB332

贾子璇, 林松, 贾晓龙, 杨小平. 基于渐进损伤数值模拟的复合材料气瓶爆破压强优化[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2020, 0(8): 25-31.

JIA Zi-xuan, LIN Song, JIA Xiao-long, YANG Xiao-ping. OPTIMIZATION OF COMPOSITE CYLINDER BURST PRESSURE BASED ON PROGRESSIVE DAMAGE NUMERICAL SIMULATION[J]. Composites Science and Engineering, 2020, 0(8): 25-31.

参考文献

[1] 徐君臣, 银建中. 纤维缠绕复合材料气瓶研究进展[J]. 应用科技, 2012, 39(4): 64-71.

[2] 常新龙, 张晓军, 刘新国, 等. 复合材料气瓶有限元分析与爆破压力预测[J]. 火箭推进, 2008(4): 27-31.
[3] MAUS S, HAPKE J, RANONG C N, et al. Filling procedure for vehicles with compressed hydrogen tanks[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(17): 4612-4621.
[4] 徐彦龙. 缠绕复合气瓶的失效分析[D]. 武汉: 武汉工程大学, 2015.
[5] 岳忠, 李晓辉, 张树. 基于ANSYS对车用全复合材料CNG气瓶的安全研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2011, 21(3): 77-83.
[6] 张广哲, 王和慧, 关凯书. 碳纤维缠绕储氢瓶的有限元自紧分析和爆破压力预测[J]. 压力容器, 2011, 28(8): 27-34, 43.
[7] XU P, ZHENG J Y, LIU P F. Finite element analysis of burst pressure of composite hydrogen storage vessels[J]. Materials and Design, 2009, 30(7): 2295-2301.
[8] LEH D, SAFFRÉP, FRANCESCATO P, et al. A progressive failure analysis of a 700-bar type Ⅳ hydrogen composite pressure vessel[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(38): 13206-13214.
[9] CHAMIS C C, MINNETYAN L, GOTSIS P K. Progressive fracture and damage tolerance of composite pressure vessels[J]. Journal of advanced materials, 1998, 30(1).
[10] 周丹, 王应军, 孙明清. 两种不同铝内衬碳纤维缠绕复合材料气瓶受力状况的对比分析[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2016(6): 76-80, 32.
[11] WANG R G, JIAO W C, LIU W B, et al. Dome thickness prediction of composite pressure vessels by a cubic spline function and finite element analysis[J]. Polymers & Polymer Composites, 2011, 19(2/3).
[12] 陈旦, 祖磊, 许家忠, 等. 干纱缠绕复合材料压力容器的结构设计与强度分析[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2019(2): 5-12, 44.
[13] 李汝鹏, 陈磊, 刘学术, 等. 基于渐进损伤理论的复合材料开孔拉伸失效分析[J]. 航空材料学报, 2018, 38(5): 138-146.
[14] HASHIN Z. Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1980, 47(2): 329-334.
[15] 李伟占. 复合材料层合板损伤失效模拟分析[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2012.
[16] RAMIREZ J P B, HALM D, GRANDIDIER J C, et al. 700 bar type Ⅳ high pressure hydrogen storage vessel burst-simulation and experimental validation[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(38).
[17] WANG L, ZHENG C X, LUO H Y, et al. Continuum damage modeling and progressive failure analysis of carbon fiber/epoxy composite pressure vessel[J]. Composite Structures, 2015, 134(1): 475-482.