复材约束海水海砂混凝土圆柱极限应力及极限应变计算方法分析

doi:10.19936/j.cnki.2096-8000.20211228.003

复合材料科学与工程 ›› 2021, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (12): 19-24.DOI: 10.19936/j.cnki.2096-8000.20211228.003

复材约束海水海砂混凝土圆柱极限应力及极限应变计算方法分析

李奔奔^1,2, 李鹏举², 詹瑒^3*

1.东南大学混凝土及预应力混凝土结构教育部重点实验室,南京210096;
2.南京工业大学土木工程学院,南京211816;
3.南京工程学院建筑工程学院,南京211167

收稿日期:2021-04-27 出版日期:2021-12-28 发布日期:2022-01-07
通讯作者: 詹瑒(1983-),男,博士,副教授,主要从事复合材料方面的研究,y_zhan@126.com。
作者简介:李奔奔(1991-),女,博士,讲师,主要从事复合材料方面的研究。
基金资助:
东南大学混凝土及预应力混凝土结构教育部重点实验室开放课题基金(CPCSME2019-04);江苏省高等学校自然科学研究面上项目(20KJB560003)

Analysis of calculation method for ultimate stress and strain of FRP-confined seawater sea-sand concrete cylinders

LI Ben-ben^1,2, LI Peng-ju², ZHAN Yang^3*

1. Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures of the Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China;
2. College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China;
3. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211167, China

Received:2021-04-27 Online:2021-12-28 Published:2022-01-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过复材约束海水海砂混凝土(SSC)圆柱试验数据考察了3个计算模型(Lim模型、Wei模型及Jiang模型)对极限应力及极限应变的适用性及预测精度。分析结果表明,计算模型预测极限应力的精度总体高于预测极限应变的精度。在预测极限应力的3个模型中,Lim模型和Jiang模型呈现出相似的较高的精度,平均绝对误差AAE分别为10.7%和11.0%,预测值与试验值比值的平均值Mean分别为104.3%和105.8%。Wei模型对极限应力的预测值与试验值相比整体偏低(Mean=81.0%),误差相对较大(AAE=19.6%)。在此3个模型中,建议采用Lim模型来预测复材约束SSC的极限应力,同时Jiang模型由于预测精度与Lim模型相似,但所需公式数量少,相比Lim模型计算更简便,也推荐使用。在预测极限应变的3个计算模型中,Lim模型的精度最高(AAE=27.8%,Mean=99.4%),而Wei模型及Jiang模型则低估了复材约束SSC的极限应变,Mean值分别为74.5%和52.2%,建议采用Lim模型来预测复材约束SSC的极限应变。就整体而言,在3个计算模型中,Lim模型在预测极限应力及极限应变时都取得最佳精度,为预测复材海水海砂混凝土极限状态的最优模型。

关键词: 复材约束, 海水海砂混凝土, 极限应力, 极限应变, 预测精度

Abstract: This paper investigates the applicability and prediction accuracy of three calculation models (Lim's model, Wei's model and Jiang's model) for ultimate stress and strain based on test database of FRP-confined seawater sea-sand concrete (SSC) cylinders. The analysis results show that the accuracy of the calculation model for predicting ultimate stress is generally higher than that of predicting ultimate strain. Among the three models for predicting ultimate stress, Lim's model and Jiang's model show similar high accuracy, with the average absolute error AAE equal to 10.7% and 11.0%, and the average mean of the ratio of the predicted value to the experimental value Mean equal to 104.3% and 105.8%. Compared with the experimental value, the predicted value of the Wei's model for ultimate stress is overall lower (Mean=81.0%), and the error is relatively large (AAE=19.6%). Among these three models, it is recommended to use Lim's model to predict the ultimate stress of FRP-confined SSC. At the same time, Jiang's model is also recommended because of similar prediction accuracy, easier computation with fewer formulas compared with Lim's model. Among the three calculation models for predicting the ultimate strain, Lim's model has the highest accuracy (AAE=27.8%, Mean=99.4%)while Wei's model and Jiang's model underestimate the ultimate strain of FRP-confined SSC, with Mean up to 74.5% and 52.2%, respectively. It is recommended to use Lim's model to predict the ultimate strain of FRP-confined SSC. To sum up, Lim's model is the best model among three calculation models for predicting the ultimate state of FRP-confined SSC since best accuracy has been achieved by Lim's model in both ultimate stress prediction and ultimate strain prediction.

Key words: FRP confinement, seawater sea-sand concrete, ultimate stress, ultimate strain, prediction accuracy

中图分类号:

TB332

李奔奔, 李鹏举, 詹瑒. 复材约束海水海砂混凝土圆柱极限应力及极限应变计算方法分析[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2021, 0(12): 19-24.

LI Ben-ben, LI Peng-ju, ZHAN Yang. Analysis of calculation method for ultimate stress and strain of FRP-confined seawater sea-sand concrete cylinders[J]. COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 0(12): 19-24.

参考文献

[1] 何志标. CFRP约束海水海砂混凝土圆柱轴压力学性能研究[D]. 广州: 广东工业大学, 2018.
[2] YANG J L, WANG J Z, WANG Z R. Axial compressive behavior of partially CFRP confined seawater sea-sand concrete in circular columns-Part Ⅰ: Experimental study[J]. Composite Structures, 2020, 246: 112373.
[3] 曾繁新. FRP约束模拟海砂混凝土圆柱轴压性能研究[D]. 温州: 温州大学, 2017.
[4] 袁逸. FRP约束模拟海水混凝土标准圆柱轴压性能研究[D]. 温州: 温州大学, 2018.
[5] ZENG J J, GAO W Y, DUAN Z J, et al. Axial compressive behavior of polyethylene terephthalate/carbon FRP-confined seawater sea-sand concrete in circular columns[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 234: 117383.
[6] WANG J, FENG P, HAO T, et al. Axial compressive behavior of seawater coral aggregate concrete-filled FRP tubes[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 147: 272-285.
[7] OZBAKKALOGLU T, LIM J C. Axial compressive behavior of FRP-confined concrete: Experimental test database and a new design-oriented model[J]. Composites Part B-Engineering, 2013, 55: 607-634.
[8] WEI Y Y, WU Y F. Unified stress-strain model of concrete for FRP-confined columns[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2012, 26(1): 381-392.
[9] JIANG T, TENG J G. Analysis-oriented stress-strain models for FRP-confined concrete[J]. Engineering Structures, 2007, 29(11): 2968-2986.
[10] LIM J C, OZBAKKALOGLU T. Design model for FRP-confined normal- and high-strength concrete square and rectangular columns[J]. Magazine of Concrete Research, 2014, 66(20): 1020-1035.
[11] 詹瑒, 李奔奔, 崔璟, 等. 双轴对称截面FRP轴心受压杆件整体屈曲临界力计算方法分析[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2021(6): 58-64.
[12] LIM J C, KARAKUS M, OZBAKKALOGLU T. Evaluation of ultimate conditions of FRP-confined concrete columns using genetic programming[J]. Computers and Structures, 2016, 162: 28-37.
[13] FAM A Z, RIZKALLA S H. Confinement model for axially loaded concrete confined by circular fiber-reinforced polymer tubes[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2001, 98(4): 451-461.
[14] 张冰, 赵庆, 黄涛, 等. ±60°缠绕的纤维复材管约束混凝土短柱轴压试验研究[J]. 工业建筑, 2017, 47(11): 35-40, 72.
[15] 李鹏. GFRP管约束海砂再生混凝土轴压力学性能研究[D]. 青岛: 山东科技大学, 2019.

复材约束海水海砂混凝土圆柱极限应力及极限应变计算方法分析

Analysis of calculation method for ultimate stress and strain of FRP-confined seawater sea-sand concrete cylinders

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李奔奔, 李鹏举, 詹瑒. 纤维增强复合材料约束海水海砂混凝土方柱极限应力及极限应变计算方法分析[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2022, 0(2): 52-55.
[2]	詹瑒, 李奔奔, 崔璟, 杨亚强. 工字形截面FRP杆件局部屈曲临界力计算方法分析[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2021, 0(8): 5-10.
[3]	詹瑒, 李奔奔, 崔璟, 杨亚强. 双轴对称截面FRP轴心受压杆件整体屈曲临界力计算方法分析[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2021, 0(6): 58-64.