纤维增强复合材料约束海水海砂混凝土方柱极限应力及极限应变计算方法分析

doi:10.19936/j.cnki.2096-8000.20220228.008

复合材料科学与工程 ›› 2022, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (2): 52-55.DOI: 10.19936/j.cnki.2096-8000.20220228.008

纤维增强复合材料约束海水海砂混凝土方柱极限应力及极限应变计算方法分析

李奔奔^1,2, 李鹏举², 詹瑒^3*

1.东南大学东南大学混凝土及预应力混凝土结构教育部重点实验室,南京210096;
2.南京工业大学土木工程学院,南京211816;
3.南京工程学院建筑工程学院,南京211167

收稿日期:2021-05-25 出版日期:2022-02-28 发布日期:2022-03-14
通讯作者: 詹瑒(1983-),博士,副教授,主要从事复合材料方面的研究,y_zhan@126.com。
作者简介:李奔奔(1991-),博士,讲师,主要从事复合材料方面的研究。
基金资助:
东南大学混凝土及预应力混凝土结构教育部重点实验室开放课题基金(CPCSME2019-04);江苏省高等学校自然科学研究面上项目(20KJB560003)

Analysis of calculation model for ultimate stress and strain ofFRP-confined seawater sea-sand concrete square columns

LI Ben-ben^1,2, LI Peng-ju², ZHAN Chang^3*

1. Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures of the Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China;
2. College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China;
3. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211167, China

Received:2021-05-25 Online:2022-02-28 Published:2022-03-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文通过纤维增强复合材料约束海水海砂混凝土(SSC)方柱试验数据考察了3个计算模型(Lam模型、Wei模型及Lim模型)对其极限应力及极限应变的适用性及预测精度。分析结果表明,计算模型预测极限应力的精度总体高于预测极限应变的精度。在预测极限应力的3个模型中,Lam模型呈现出相对较高的精度,平均绝对误差AAE最小,为12.4%,Lim模型和Wei模型的AAE分别为16.8%及18.2%。在预测极限应变的3个计算模型中,Lim模型的精度最高(AAE=14.3%),而Lam模型及Wei模型则大幅低估了纤维增强复合材料约束SSC方柱的极限应变,预测值与试验值比值的平均值Mean分别为68.1%和56.1%。故而在这3个模型中,预测极限应力时Lam模型表现出最高精度,在预测极限应变时,Lim模型表现最佳。

关键词: 复材约束, 海水海砂混凝土方柱, 极限应力, 极限应变, 预测精度

Abstract: The applicability and prediction accuracy of three calculation models (Lam′s model, Wei′s model and Lim′s model) for ultimate stress and strain was evaluated based on test database of FRP-confined seawater sea-sand concrete (SSC) square columns. Higher prediction accuracy of models for ultimate stress compared with that of models for ultimate strain can be found through the analysis results. Among the three models for predicting ultimate stress, Lam′s model exhibits relatively higher accuracy with the smallest average absolute error AAE equal to 12.4%. AAE of Lim′s model and Wei′s model is 16.8% and 18.2%, respectively. Among the three models for predicting ultimate strain, Lim′s model has the highest accuracy (AAE=14.3%) while Lam′s model and Wei′s model largely underestimate the ultimate strain of FRP-confined SSC square columns, with the average ratio of prediction value to experimental value Mean equal to 68.1% and 56.1%, respectively. Therefore, among the three models, Lam′s model shows the highest accuracy for ultimate stress prediction, while Lim′s model is the best for ultimate strain prediction.

Key words: FRP confinement, seawater sea-sand concrete square columns, ultimate stress, ultimate strain, prediction accuracy

中图分类号:

TB332

李奔奔, 李鹏举, 詹瑒. 纤维增强复合材料约束海水海砂混凝土方柱极限应力及极限应变计算方法分析[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2022, 0(2): 52-55.

LI Ben-ben, LI Peng-ju, ZHAN Chang. Analysis of calculation model for ultimate stress and strain ofFRP-confined seawater sea-sand concrete square columns[J]. COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 0(2): 52-55.

参考文献

[1] KATANO K, TAKEDA N, ISHIZEKI Y, et al. Properties and application of concrete made with sea water and un-washed sea sand[C]//International Committee of the SCMT conferences. 3rd International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies. Kyoto, Japan: SCMT, 2013.
[2] LAM L, TENG J G. Design-oriented stress-strain model for FRP-confined concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2003, 17(6-7): 471-489.
[3] 曾岚, 李丽娟, 陈光明, 等. GFRP-再生混凝土-钢管组合柱轴压力学性能试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2014, 47(s2): 21-27.
[4] LAM L, TENG J G. Design-oriented stress-strain model for FRP-confined concrete in rectangular columns[J]. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 2003, 22(13): 1149-1186.
[5] WEI Y Y, WU Y F. Unified stress-strain model of concrete for FRP-confined columns[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2012, 26(1): 381-392.
[6] LIM J C, OZBAKKALOGLU T. Design model for FRP-confined normal- and high-strength concrete square and rectangular columns[J]. Magazine of Concrete Research, 2014, 66(20): 1020-1035.
[7] 杨天琪. CFRP约束再生粗骨料—海砂混凝土组合短柱的力学性能研究[D]. 深圳: 深圳大学, 2018.
[8] ZENG J J, DUAN Z J, GAO W Y, et al. Compressive behavior of FRP-wrapped seawater sea-sand concrete with a square cross-section[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 262: 120881.
[9] ZENG J J, GAO W Y, DUAN Z J, et al. Axial compressive behavior of polyethylene terephthalate/carbon FRP-confined seawater sea-sand concrete in circular columns[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 234: 117383.
[10] DAI J G, BAI Y L, TENG J G. Behavior and modeling of concrete confined with FRP composites of large deformability[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2011, 15(6): 963-973.
[11] PIMANMAS A, SALEEM S. Dilation characteristics of PET FRP-confined concrete[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2018, 22(3): 04018006.
[12] WANG Y, CHEN G, WAN B, et al. Behavior of circular ice-filled selfluminous FRP tubular stub columns under axial compression[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 232: 117287.
[13] LI B B, HARRIES K A. Seismic performance assessment of flexure-dominate FRP-confined RC columns using plastic rotation angle[J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 172: 453-471.
[14] 詹瑒, 李奔奔, 崔璟, 等. 双轴对称截面FRP轴心受压杆件整体屈曲临界力计算方法分析[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2021(6): 58-64.
[15] LIM J C, KARAKUS M, OZBAKKALOGLU T. Evaluation of ultimate conditions of FRP-confined concrete columns using genetic programming[J]. Computers and Structures, 2016, 162: 28-37.

纤维增强复合材料约束海水海砂混凝土方柱极限应力及极限应变计算方法分析

Analysis of calculation model for ultimate stress and strain ofFRP-confined seawater sea-sand concrete square columns

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	许森杰, 李奔奔, 李鹏举, 詹瑒. FRP约束再生骨料混凝土抗压强度及极限应变计算模型对比研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2023, 0(7): 86-90.
[2]	贾静恩, 张彬. 玄武岩纤维混凝土孔隙结构表征及劈裂拉伸试验研究[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2022, 0(10): 63-69.
[3]	詹瑒, 李奔奔, 崔璟, 杨亚强. 工字形截面FRP杆件局部屈曲临界力计算方法分析[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2021, 0(8): 5-10.
[4]	詹瑒, 李奔奔, 崔璟, 杨亚强. 双轴对称截面FRP轴心受压杆件整体屈曲临界力计算方法分析[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2021, 0(6): 58-64.
[5]	李奔奔, 李鹏举, 詹瑒. 复材约束海水海砂混凝土圆柱极限应力及极限应变计算方法分析[J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2021, 0(12): 19-24.